10 ways that SAP 2009 will impact you

22/Apr/2010
Dyfrig Hughes

The final version of the SAP 2009 methodology was published on March 23rd 2010. This article from Dyfrig Hughes of National Energy Services updates his previous article and summarises the key changes that will most affect builders and designers.

When you've read this article, you might be interested in reading about the 10 key changes to Part L1A. You can also see more about our package of online CPD to dig even deeper into the subject.

SAP 2009: Overview

SAP 2009 contains a number of things that will impact substantially on design and construction practice. We will not know the full extent until Part L 2010 is released, but the changes in SAP 2009 will in themselves have a considerable impact.

There are essentially two types of change within SAP 2009. Firstly, those that aim to improve the accuracy of the SAP methodology. Secondly, changes to make SAP more flexible, enabling a variety of new and existing technologies to be combined within a given dwelling. The overall effect will be an increase in the predicted energy consumption of dwellings for heating, partly offset by a drop in hot water consumption.

There will also be an increase in energy use in dwellings with air conditioning, as the cooling load is also now considered. The amount of CO2 produced per unit of energy consumed will also change substantially in many cases, due to a new national assessment methodology. The CO2 emissions from electricity will, for example, increase by 23% between SAP 2005 and SAP 2009.

The key Building Regulations compliance criterion is that the Dwelling Emission Rate (DER) for the proposed dwelling must be less or equal to the Target Emission Rate (TER). The DER and TER are based on carbon emissions per square metre of floor area for heating, hot water and lighting. Many of the changes in SAP 2009 will affect both the DER and TER. This means that housing developers may not feel the full impact of these increases in emissions. It will however be harder to achieve a zero carbon home.

This article looks at the 10 changes within SAP that seem most likely to impact design and construction.

1. Party Walls

In SAP 2005, heat loss through party walls is assumed to be zero. In SAP 2009, the U-value of a cavity party wall will be set to between 0.0 and 0.5 W/m2/°C, depending upon the specification.
This is because research by Leeds Beckett University has demonstrated that air movement within the cavity leads to a substantial amount of heat loss; more so than a similar area of external wall. In the dwellings studied in their research, the effective U-values for cavity party walls were estimated at between 0.50 and 0.63 as compared to the external wall U-value of 0.23 and the floor U-value of 0.17. Developers must now design and build so as to eliminate this air movement—for example, fully filling the party cavity in conjunction with sealing the cavity at top and bottom.

The U-values assumed by SAP 2009 are therefore taken as 0.50 for an unfilled, unsealed cavity; 0.20 for a sealed unfilled cavity and 0.0 for a fully filled and sealed cavity. For more details of the research backing this up and of the measures that can be taken to address the problem, see:

http://www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/as/cebe/projects/stamford/pdfs/del7coheating.pdf

2. Thermal Bridges

In SAP 2005 it is possible to assess the impact of non-repeating thermal bridges very easily by adopting Accredited Construction details and assigning an effective U-value (the ‘y’ value) of 0.08 W/m2/°C.

In practice, the Accredited Construction Details approach does not appear to be delivering buildings on the ground with the claimed thermal performance. A better approach is to assess the heat losses through each thermal bridge and to add them all up. This approach is already available in SAP 2005 as the preferred approach, but it requires more work than being able to select a single ‘y value’. As U-values are increasingly reduced to generate further CO2 reductions, the proportion of heat loss through thermal bridges becomes increasingly important. The only ‘y value’ option available in SAP 2009 is the ‘worse case’ value of 0.15.

To better this, developers and SAP assessors will need to examine the detailing at junctions, e.g. between walls, floors, roofs, windows and internal walls; and to properly assess the heat loss through thermal bridges. Changes in the SAP methodology for carrying out these calculations also mean that the calculated thermal bridging heat loss may be significantly higher in SAP 2009 than was the same calculation in SAP 2005. This is because SAP 2005 ignored junctions with party walls and, where Accredited Construction Details are not being used, the calculated values are also multiplied by 1.25. The calculated y value of a given dwelling type can be used in other dwellings of the same type.

3. Cooling and Air Conditioning

SAP 2005 includes an assessment of the risk of the dwelling overheating in summer, and is one of the criteria for Building Regulations approval. If dwellings overheat there is a risk that the usage of portable and fixed air conditioning systems will increase, with a consequent increase in carbon emissions. SAP 2009 adds the ability to assess the need for cooling and the associated energy and carbon emissions from fixed air conditioning systems. Homes fitted with fixed air conditioning will therefore see an increased DER.

As these systems run on electricity the associated CO2 emissions can be substantial. A 3 kW system running continuously for four hours per day from June to August would produce around 650 kg of CO2. On this basis the DER in a dwelling with a floor area of 150 m2 would be over 4 kg CO2/m2 (as compared to a typical DER in a 2006 Regulations dwelling of around 22).

However, SAP 2009 takes a number of factors into account in estimating the energy consumption, including the A-to-G rating of the unit, the thermal mass of the dwelling and the external temperatures in the region that the dwelling is located. SAP 2009 also assumes that the dwelling only needs cooling down to a temperature of 24°C. The effect of this is that the increase in the DER due to the air conditioning is likely to be much less than 4 kg CO2/m2.

Notice that, unlike heating, the cooling load will vary by region. This makes increasingly questionable the fact that, for the heating calculation, SAP assumes the same external temperatures in the north of Scotland as it does in the south of England. Indeed one of the questions posed in the consultation document for SAP 2009 was “Looking ahead, should SAP ratings be regionally dependant?”

4. Thermal Mass

Thermal mass is a measure of how ‘lightweight’ or ‘heavyweight’ a building is. Timber frame is typically a ‘lightweight’ construction whereas a building with external, party and internal walls made from heavyweight block and with concrete lower and upper floors is typically ‘heavyweight’.
‘Heavyweight’ energy efficient homes generally make better use of solar gains in the day by absorbing them and radiating the warmth later on as the level of solar radiation drops.

The summer overheating calculation in SAP 2005 takes thermal mass into account. SAP 2009 takes this a step further by using the thermal mass in calculating the heating and cooling load. Experience in the Republic of Ireland, where thermal mass is already part of their SAP calculation, indicates that the inclusion of thermal mass for heating will lead to differences in SAP ratings of around 1% between lightweight and heavyweight constructions.

5. Hot Water

The main change of interest to designers, developers and builders here is that the assumed hot water usage in a dwelling is reduced by 5% if the dwelling is designed to achieve a water use target of not more than 125 litres per person per day (all water use, hot and cold). The estimated hot water consumption of a dwelling by SAP 2009 is also lower than that of SAP 2005, particularly so in larger dwellings.

6. Multiple Heating or Ventilation Systems

In SAP 2005, you could only have one central heating system, backed up by one room heater. SAP 2009 enables you to have two central heating systems or boilers running on different fuels.

The heat load is split between two separate systems according to the floor area served. It is not quite clear yet how assessors will apportion the heat load between two different boilers serving the same heating circuit.

Community heating schemes can now also be accommodated that have two boilers (or two sets of boilers) running on different fuels in addition to a Combined Heat and Power (CHP) plant. Similarly, a dwelling can now be served by two different mechanical ventilation systems.

7. Heat Pumps

In SAP 2005, the Coefficient of Performance (COP) of a heat pump was fixed within the SAP calculation. SAP 2009 enables manufacturers to add their heat pumps to a database containing the specific COP. Systems started being added to the Appendix Q website in early 2010.

Early indications are that the performance of some of these systems is actually lower than that obtained by selecting the default values available in SAP. To deal with this problem, these default values in SAP 2009 may well end up being reduced by the time SAP 2009 comes into use in October 2010.

8. Innovative Technologies

SAP 2005 introduced the Appendix Q feature. This was to enable newly available innovative technologies to be included within a SAP calculation without having to wait until the next SAP revision.
This appears to have worked well, although the number of technologies added since SAP 2005 came out has been fairly small. SAP 2009 allows more than one system to be added at one time. So for example, it will be possible to add a system that recovers heat from boiler flue gases as well as a system that recovers heat from waste water from showers.

9. CO2 Emission Factors

SAP 2009 includes a significant revision in the assumed CO2 emissions per kWh of fuel used. For example, the factor for electricity increases from 0.422 to 0.517, i.e. a 23% increase. By contrast, mains gas goes up from 0.194 to 0.198—a 2% increase.

There is also a substantial drop in the emissions associated with community heating schemes running on waste combustion (down 30%), biomass (down 48%) and biogas (down 28%).

Similarly, for individual heating systems, emissions from wood chips go down (64%)while emissions from wood pellets in bags go up (12%). This is because the calculations now include many more factors (e.g. transportation) and are more uniform across all fuels.

Although these changes will most likely be masked in Building Regulations due to the TER/DER approach, they will generally make it more difficult to achieve low and zero carbon with individual heating systems and easier with community heating systems. They will also change the relative performance of systems running on the various fuels.

10. Lights, Appliances and Cooking

These all contribute heat to a dwelling, some of which is useful and which reduces the heating requirements of the dwelling. SAP 2009 includes two ways of assessing these and other incidental gains (such as heating from pipework, solar gains and heat gains from people). The DER will assume a level of gains that is around 33% lower than that assumed in the SAP rating. This is to encourage builders to get the heat and cooling demand of the dwelling down to a level that presumes the presence of low energy appliances and lighting. The SAP incidental gains are used for the cooling and summer overheating assessments.

Conclusion

SAP 2009 contains a number of things that will impact designers, builders and developers. The most significant changes likely to affect work on site are the need to insulate and seal party walls and the need to pay serious attention to non-repeating thermal bridges.

However, there are also a host of other changes that taken together will have a significant impact. We will need to see the accompanying Part L changes before the full impact becomes clear. These will be covered by National Energy Services in a separate paper.

20th April 2010

Download the 10 ways that SAP 2009 will affect you (PDF)

The views expressed in this blog article are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of National Energy Services.  When submitting a comment, please be aware of the guidelines provided in our website terms and conditions.

Comments

 

After reading point 9 which states SAP 2009 includes a significant revision in the assumed CO2 emissions per kWh of fuel used. For example, the factor for electricity increases from 0.422 to 0.517, i.e. a 23% increase. By contrast, mains gas goes up from 0.194 to 0.198—a 2% increase.

I am baffled by the fact that the UK Government has committed to reduce its overall CO2 emmissions by reducing the amount of energy used in domestic and commercial properties and also by reducing the amount of fossil fuels being consumed.

Therefore could someone explain why the use of electricity in new build and existing properties is being stifled by increasing the CO2 emmission factor per KWh by 23%? There seems a lack of common sense was applied when making this decision and at the same time contradicting the regulation it refers to for the following reasons;

1. As renewable power production increases in the UK, a property using electricity as its sole fuel for heating, hot water etc will decrease its carbon production as a result until it eventually creates no carbon as is happening with French properties that are being supplied by nuclear and other renewable power sources.

2. Where the contradiction factor comes in, is the fact that statements are being made by The Government and media regarding electrically powered vehicles having zero carbon emmissions. How can an electrically powered vehicle create no CO2 emmissions when in use, but a property which uses an electric boiler for heating and hot water or an air conditioning unit for cooling are both very poorly rated under SAP, RSAP and DER, when the electrically powered vehicle uses the exact same power supply to recharge its battery?

A phase in of electric heating appliances should be taking place in the UK with immediate effect as it increases its renewable electricity production. Especially as we become more dependant on the import of natural gas.

This point should be high on the UK Governments priority list as the UK would be placed in a very vulnerble position if a sudden increase in cost was applied to our natural gas imports or even worse if the supply was severed.

Timescales for the number of installions which would have to be adapted would take decades as the amount of qualified engineers can just about cope with the 1.4 million boiler and new heating system replacements that are being carried out on an annual basis in the UK.

 

After reading point 9 which states SAP 2009 includes a significant revision in the assumed CO2 emissions per kWh of fuel used. For example, the factor for electricity increases from 0.422 to 0.517, i.e. a 23% increase. By contrast, mains gas goes up from 0.194 to 0.198—a 2% increase.

I am baffled by the fact that the UK Government has committed to reduce its overall CO2 emmissions by reducing the amount of energy used in domestic and commercial properties and also by reducing the amount of fossil fuels being consumed.

Therefore could someone explain why the use of electricity in new build and existing properties is being stifled by increasing the CO2 emmission factor per KWh by 23%? There seems a lack of common sense was applied when making this decision and at the same time contradicting the regulation it refers to for the following reasons;

1. As renewable power production increases in the UK, a property using electricity as its sole fuel for heating, hot water etc will decrease its carbon production as a result until it eventually creates no carbon as is happening with French properties that are being supplied by nuclear and other renewable power sources.

2. Where the contradiction factor comes in, is the fact that statements are being made by The Government and media regarding electrically powered vehicles having zero carbon emmissions. How can an electrically powered vehicle create no CO2 emmissions when in use, but a property which uses an electric boiler for heating and hot water or an air conditioning unit for cooling are both very poorly rated under SAP, RSAP and DER, when the electrically powered vehicle uses the exact same power supply to recharge its battery?

A phase in of electric heating appliances should be taking place in the UK with immediate effect as it increases its renewable electricity production. Especially as we become more dependant on the import of natural gas.

This point should be high on the UK Governments priority list as the UK would be placed in a very vulnerble position if a sudden increase in cost was applied to our natural gas imports or even worse if the supply was severed.

Timescales for the number of installions which would have to be adapted would take decades as the amount of qualified engineers can just about cope with the 1.4 million boiler and new heating system replacements that are being carried out on an annual basis in the UK.

 

> "Therefore could someone explain...increasing the CO2 emmission factor per KWh by 23%?"

Because that's the fact of the matter. Simples.

> "How can an electrically powered vehicle create no CO2 emmissions when in use, but a property which uses electric boiler (be) very poorly rated under SAP."

Now THAT'S an interesting question! Of course the real answer is that electric cars are not zero carbon, but I don't suppose that's the answer that's required here.

IMO, the important thing is that these things are treated *consistently*, by Govt and others.

Post new comment